spacer.png, 0 kB
We have 4 guests online
We have had 330,013 visitors
There have been 820 forum posts

Last content update:
2nd April 2008, 1:55 pm
(forum posts may be more recent)

News Feed

We now have an RSS News Feed. If you install the Google Destop (requires Windows Vista/XP/2000 SP3+ or Mac) and a news reader gadget such as OneFeed, you can have the very latest Lewes Matters news in real-time on your desktop!

And the following feed is for the latest forum posts...
Forum RSS Feed

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter:
Name:
Email address :
  Receive HTML?

spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
About the Architect

The Architect - Piers Gough RA

Piers GoughPiers Gough once famously and not entirely fairly described himself as a ‘B movie architect’. His work certainly has a sense of playfulness that serious modernists eschewed, though if anything this characteristic broadens its ability to engage with sophisticated social and intellectual agendas. He designed the RA’s exhibition on Sir John Soane, one of British architecture’s most intellectually demanding figures, while his Green Bridge in London’s East End turns two scrappy pieces of open space into a park by merging them into one green zone, and creates commercial opportunities in its undercroft.

Courtesy of the Royal Academy

On the topic of local campaigners, Piers Gough says...

"The deification of the destructive whinge culture is incredibly bad for us spiritually and physically.

The public’s prejudices are already too well represented in the planning system. The government’s central policies and local government UDPs are constraining and protective of the uses and scale of development. The public is invited to add its views at every stage of their adoption and the result is as close to public interest coercion on private developers as is possible short of nationalisation. On top of this, edicts from Cabe, EH, the Environment Agency et al represent public attitudes in their holier-than-thou armchair advice.

Increasing coercion leads to increasingly complex application requirements with ever more opportunity for errors. The public is encouraged to object to all applications in any meretricious way it pleases regardless of the facts. The supposed objective system of planning officers presenting to councillors is then gerrymandered by political self-interest, on the basis that there are more votes in refusal than approval. It is no coincidence that the most interesting buildings of the last 20 years tend to have no residents nearby. Some quite reasonable people become rabidly reactionary and nauseatingly self- righteous as local residents.

That the judiciary should pander to this unrepresentative minority and extend the insanely protracted process that planning has become is an example of the fantastic decadence of institutionalised inaction.

No doubt it will get worse."

From bd The Architects' Website 9th March 2007 re. "Do local campaigners have too much power?"

Comments
a student of Lewes
Written by Guest on 2006-03-20 21:14:43
The beauty and quality of a town as special as Lewes stems from its organic growth and juxtaposition of small building plots. No scheme by a single architect can match this, particularly one known for 'powerful gestures' which tend to dominate their surroundings.
The Dude
Written by Guest on 2006-07-21 06:46:05
I don't quite understand why this would be a problem. surely splitting the site for development would just lead to hotch potch piecemeal development. Developers would not split the site up as it would be viable. A powerful gesture may be good for the town and add to the interest of the Lewes townscape

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment 2.0!

 
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB